The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So there were a couple of cancers. Well, let's go even further than that. Based on everything you said a moment ago, it's pretty clear that we need systemic therapy. We've reached the limits of local therapy. So surgery and radiation work pretty darn well when they work. but there ain't a lot of ways to make it better. Yeah, you can minimize their adverse effects. Exactly right. You can make them less harmful, but they're about as efficacious as they can be.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.