The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there were 50 living centenarians in Iceland with a population of just over 300,000 right the size of Rhode Island yeah right so there was like I think that they were saying it was the highest concentration of centenarians in the world
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there were 50 living centenarians in Iceland with a population of just over 300,000 right the size of Rhode Island yeah right so there was like I think that they were saying it was the highest concentration of centenarians in the world
there are many regions of the world Hong Kong Iceland where there is also a higher than average proportion of centenarians and super centenarians who eat diets that are nothing like the Blue Zones quote-unquote diets