The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when I'm when I'm talking about matching my my volume of the dose distribution to exactly conform to the tumor volume that's something that's very easy to talk about but I mean for a for a uh an educated patient they can ask to see the actual computer simulations
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
for a uh an educated patient they can ask to see the actual computer simulations