Peter Attia· MD
And the difference was when it was really working, it was one-on-one and then they started to say to save money, they had six one. And tutoring six to one is not right. It's not individualized.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And the difference was when it was really working, it was one-on-one and then they started to say to save money, they had six one. And tutoring six to one is not right. It's not individualized.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.