Peter Attia· MD
which clearly change uh the risk
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
which clearly change uh the risk
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
A woman who has um early onset of uh menarchy menstration or hormone replacement therapy uh such that they have longer estrogen exposure or shorter period of nursing or shorter uh fewer pregnancies they might have a 25 or 30% greater risk of breast cancer but that only moves the needle from around 12% to around 15%