Peter Attia· MD
and the radial shock is a 100 times Less in terms of pressure it's over a thousand times over in terms of time so it's a longer shock and it's less penetration
Verbal pushback — no audited source on record.
90
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and the radial shock is a 100 times Less in terms of pressure it's over a thousand times over in terms of time so it's a longer shock and it's less penetration
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there are two types of machines there are machines that have a focal shock and those that have a radial shock okay and the radial shock is a hundred times Less in terms of pressure it's over a thousand times over in terms of time so it's a longer shock and it's less penetration