The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think what's amazing to me is I I just think there's too many people that don't know this right i think there's too many people that are walking around sort of suffering either from something that's cosmetically upsetting like a huge kloid uh especially on a visible part of their body uh obviously the people everybody listening can relate to some nagging injury tennis elbow golfer's elbow Achilles tendonopathy hamstring tendonopathy uh these things nag for years at times
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think what's amazing to me is I I just think there's too many people that don't know this right I think there's too many people that are walking around sort of suffering either from something that's cosmetically upsetting like a huge kloid uh especially on a visible part of their body uh obviously the people everybody listening can relate to some nagging injury tennis elbow golfer's elbow Achilles tendonopathy hamstring tendonopathy uh these things nag for years at times