The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
stress only causes telogen effluvium so what really happened is that this person had the predisposition for male pattern hair loss they already had the ingredients and the androgens necessary to begin that process of hair follicle miniaturization and stress lead to excessive hair shedding which then fed into the miniaturization process it accelerated it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what this suggests is then let's go back to that person who was really stressed out and lost all of their hair in in a three year period because of this job that they took well they said that it was because of stress but from an evidence standpoint stress only causes telogen effluvium so what really happened is that this person had the predisposition for male pattern hair loss they already had the ingredients and the androgens necessary to begin that process of hair follicle miniaturization and stress lead to excessive hair shedding which then fed into the miniaturization process it accelerated it