The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I'll also sometimes use if I really need to work on the quad I'll do Blood Flow Restriction in those circumstances because it's lower loads and provides a very similar amount of injury to the muscle as high load training would do
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and I'll also sometimes use if I really need to work on the quad I'll do Blood Flow Restriction in those circumstances because it's lower loads and provides a very similar amount of injury to the muscle as high load training would do