We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it pains me in some way in a field that is so rich and has generated so much data that there's a whole cloud. sort of lying on top of sertuins and NAD that you know there's nothing there's nothing there I I just tell people it is an incredibly u studied system uh we are still juggling the complexity and I would argue that any any field where um the the same degree of of investigation will be conducted will have the same controversy.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.