The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what I'm afraid of are the long-term consequences of this that don't seem trivial even in young people and you know there was an article in Gemma maybe two months ago that talked about some of the long-term uh Neuropsychiatric complications that are being seen in up to a quarter of people 6 and 12 months out and to me those are the things that are of grave concern
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.