The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and particularly one collected over time so kind of analogous to your ps your PSA velocity example where you're sampling at multiple time points if you sample at multiple time points now and subject those I don't mean just of the methods that are you know being early or being commercialized now but but are being commercialized I mean since we've four years ago what what felt like you know very much a research method is now emerging as a real clinical option
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.