The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The first thing I do is I I check to see if their pinky goes to 90° if their thumb comes to their forearm on either side that's each of those is one point if they hyperextend their elbows greater than 10° same with their knees and then I want to see if they could put their hands on the floor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we have something called The Bait and score where we get a sense of if someone has • loose ligaments ERS Danos would be an example of a connected tissue disorder that want to know about because that may mean they have specific injuries so it's a basically a ninepoint scale
we have something called the baiting score where we get a sense of if someone has loose ligaments ehlers-danlos would be an example of a connective tissue disorder that I want to know about because that may mean they have specific injuries so it's a basically a nine point scale the first thing I do is I I check to see if their pinky goes to 90 degrees if their thumb comes to their forearm on either side that's each of those is one point if they hyper extend their elbows greater than 10 degrees same with the knees and then I want to see if they could put their hands on the floor