The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
just jumping off the curb because there was Ice you're like oh you're in 90 and you just decided to jump that curb for fun like when no one was watching you cuz we could like see them from the window coming in I'm was like just so just like uh one guy finishing a video to Max sitting on the chair taking like two breaths and going I didn't understand the test let me try it again I'm trying to get back on the bike this is like 12 seconds after VI to maxess
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we actually did a uh another study in Stockholm Sweden with lifelong skiers um I won't get too derailed here but these are people who are world champions the 1940s and 50s in cross country skiing Olympic gold medalists and didn't stop competing now they're in the age of 85 Plus up to 92 years old we're still competitive years and compar them to AG matched healthy folks um over here in America