Peter Attia· MD
so two is inadequate because the needle can bend it can deflect sometimes the needle is going in 20 cm beyond your hand so you have to account for the deflection
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so two is inadequate because the needle can bend it can deflect sometimes the needle is going in 20 cm beyond your hand so you have to account for the deflection
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that samples the spot and systematically that would be what we call Target and systematically samples the areas around the target I.E the peripheral Zone in the area kind of mapped around that leion
and the recommendation number of samples of a Target is usually three so two is inadequate because the needle can bend it can def sometimes the needle is going in 20 cm beyond your hand so you have to account for the deflection and you can track it but the idea is you do it three times