Peter Attia· MD
before the dsm5 before 2013 we were not allowed to give both those diagnosis together so they were mutually exclusive
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
before the dsm5 before 2013 we were not allowed to give both those diagnosis together so they were mutually exclusive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
interestingly before the dsm5 before 2013 we were not allowed to give both those diagnoses together so they were mutually exclusive if a child had autism we we did not give a diagnosis of ADHD
we say that about half of kids with autism also have a diagnosis of ADHD