The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it produces a double muscle phenotype is what they call it and if you look at these catalysts like you would think it's photosho by how absurd it looks this is like the Mr Olympia of cattle essentially like it would be no chance anyone would come close in you know cattle sport whatever um and in the mice same deal they have uh like a literally they call it double muscle essentially because it's you literally have double the muscle fibers as uh you know the wild typ
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yeah so it produces a double muscle phenotype is what they call it and if you look at these cattle it's like you would think it's photosho by how absurd it looks this is like the Mr Olympia of cattle essentially like it would be no chance anyone would come close in you know cattle sport whatever um and in the mice same deal they have uh like a literally they call it double muscle essentially cuz it's you literally have double the muscle fibers as uh you know the wild type