The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
oh gosh well we'd have to go back to the history books but you know there were all kinds of tonics and such that were promoted through advertising and so forth when you look at old magazines like there's always ads for exactly like some tonic or some some ridiculous chemical that you could opt urghhh ons whatever you know what I mean
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.