The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the skin section that had the highest number of betaal positive cells had only one positive cell or 10,000 yeah one in 10 to the fourth cells everybody else all the 70s 60s 50s all of those people had um fewer than one cell in 10,000
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the take message here is that ccent cells at least as indicated by that one marker beta galacti cdas are so rare that they're virtually absent from the skin of people of any age that is virtually absent I would consider 10 the minus 4th and and lower