Paul Saladino· MD
older age with an odds ratio of 1.10 i believe yes an odds ratio of one point one zero per year increase so that was that for every there was an odds ratio of one point one increase for every year increase in age
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
older age with an odds ratio of 1.10 i believe yes an odds ratio of one point one zero per year increase so that was that for every there was an odds ratio of one point one increase for every year increase in age
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
older age with an odds ratio of 1 point 1 0 per year increase so that was that for every there was an odds ratio of 1 point 1 increase for every year increase in age so as we got older they were more susceptible to this violence