The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you have the top acromion there you can probably get away with a lot more overhead activity and you might look at somebody who's in category three every time they do excessive overhead activity gets injured and you might be saying well look there's something wrong with you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you can have a type 1 a type 2 or a Type 3 acromion Type 1 is totally flat that's the majority of people type 2 the second most common in type three is about I don't remember the exact numbers but certainly it's not rare like 30 percent of people and that's the one that really predisposed you if but only if you're an overhead athlete or lifting weights overhead or doing all sorts of you know aggressive things