The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I can't tell you the number of times I go through the family history and we're talking about their grandparents and they'll say you know one of them died from some disease and the other one died very shortly thereafter despite being completely healthy they just lost interest in life and they would they describe it to me as they died of a broken heart or they just stopped thriving
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they just lost interest in life and they would they describe it to me as they died of a broken heart or they just stopped thriving um and I think that's an extension of this as well
they just lost interest in life and they would they describe it to me as they died of a broken heart or they just stopped thriving