The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you're not touching a dog or touching the dirt or touching the ground or touching the earth or swimming in a natural stream or river that is not polluted or filled with fertilizer or glyphosate or a pesticide you are missing the natural source of these four base probiotics
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's the endospore forming bacteria that that were the probiotics that we were meant to uh that we were meant to consume