The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is it's it's vaporizing the tissue and it's a laser that's sort of scanning around the cornea where it does a little treatment here and then we know thermally that we don't want to do another shot right next to that one so we move over here and we want to let the tissue cool down for a few milliseconds and then we go over here so the laser dances around
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so i can sand down the center of the wooden cornea and take the flaps off and i'm removing some you know some sawdust goes away now that is flatter and so it's less powerful in bending the light and i can focus that on the retina