The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
"After a year of support with your team and after revisiting with our specialist, my son no longer qualifies in the ASD, the autis autism spectrum diagnosis or disorder. He can now walk, talk, ride a bike, read, write, and he's no longer in special education."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And their scores will go from like a 100. Okay. So that would be a severe case down to the single digits which they no longer according to the a tech quiz they no longer fit into that criteria.