The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the data is out there the information is out there I've actually there's a couple of big Facebook groups and one is only the putrin's patients and they literally will post up I've got this big nodule what do I do my surgeon wants to cut on me and so there's actually a whole whole network now so there's a lot more of that education going on they've got big PDF files of doctors all over the US that will do deutrans radiation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.