The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you really have to think as soon as you start talking about bringing trial of a drug out of the lab and into the real world whether it's the human clinic or the veterinary clinic in the context of aging you really have to start to think about safety and side-effects right because there is a very low tolerance for side-effects when you're talking about treating a healthy person or dog
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.