The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
evolutionarily those would have been the things that were the foundation of our life we would have lived outside we want to touch the earth all the time they've been moving when we hunted we would have been cold we would have been warm I would have been in the Sun
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
our history our evolutionary path over the last two to four to six million years has really shaped who we are today whether we're talking about how we were exposed to light how we were eating and it's it's striking to me and i just want to emphasize this fact that whenever we deviate from that we run into problems as humans