We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
most of them unfortunately are pretty small and underpowered and they suffer from all the problems that we discussed earlier with underpowered studies that are selectively reported with no preregistration and with kind of haphazardly done analysis and reporting i mean they're not necessarily better than observational data that suffer from the same problems
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.