The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you can't just take a meta-analyses as gospel without actually looking at each study you don't get a pass at examining each of the constitutive studies within a meta-analysis is is really the point i think we want to make here
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you can't just take a meta-analysis as gospel without actually looking at each study you don't get a pass at examining each of the constitutive studies within a meta-analysis is is really the point I think we want to make here