Peter Attia· MD
it's much easier to spare the muscle and the ligaments when you do an anterior approach that is an approach from the front um you're saying less of the morbidity is due to less muscular damage on the approach
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's much easier to spare the muscle and the ligaments when you do an anterior approach that is an approach from the front um you're saying less of the morbidity is due to less muscular damage on the approach
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's much easier to spare the muscle and the ligaments when you do an anterior approach that is an approach from the front