The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know one thing that has been talked about is the people who live around these bat caves who have had exposure who have tested you know positive and larger numbers previously for sars antibodies um you know but you still have the same problem of if that is the or if that is a possible origin is a natural escape in location in southern china to villagers who live around those mines how does it get up to wuhan without leaving a trail of infection that could be documented
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you know one thing that has been talked about is the people who live around these bat caves who have had exposure who have tested you know positive and larger numbers previously for sars antibodies