The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you if you're really designing a trial well you have to flatten the curve on those differences so each person in each group should be getting the exact same amount of attention uh the exact same amount of touch with the investigators the exact same type of advice
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so you if you're really designing a trial well you have to flatten the curve on those differences so each person in each group should be getting the exact same amount of attention uh the exact same amount of touch with the investigators the exact same type of advice uh so that you can sort of eliminate that that that difference which unfortunately I shows up a lot
so you if you're really designing a trial well you have to flatten the curve on those differences so each person in each group should be getting the exact same amount of attention uh the exact same amount of touch with the investigators the exact same type of advice