Peter Attia· MD
so in your minus one example we would remove about 20 microns of tissue that's not a lot you figure a human human hair is about 50 microns so you know like less than half of one human hair's thickness
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so in your minus one example we would remove about 20 microns of tissue that's not a lot you figure a human human hair is about 50 microns so you know like less than half of one human hair's thickness
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.