Peter Attia· MD
as you look at the damage from specifically sars co v2 seems like a much worse virus in the sense that it causes much more direct damage to the pneumocyte so you now get much more direct damage to the end organ
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
as you look at the damage from specifically sars co v2 seems like a much worse virus in the sense that it causes much more direct damage to the pneumocyte so you now get much more direct damage to the end organ
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.