The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the sixmonth um prognosis component of the hospice benefit was really an arbitrary choice in some ways that was about getting it funded. Yeah. You know, the sort of original thinkers were like, "Yeah, this should be a year." And that's probably more right.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So what's interesting is you just said that hospice care was the original and it was 6 months of life expectancy and today we're at a point where median or mean is 3 weeks in hospice.