The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
essentially what it is it's the formation of scar tissue anytime you put a foreign body inside of inside of a human being whether it's in their knee or implant in the breast the body forms a reaction around it to wall it off and that scar tissue and that's called a capsule normally it's supposed to be soft and pliable like a balloon but if the body forms an abnormal capsule it becomes hard and it contracts or squeezes down on the implant and causes pain and distortion
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and that scar tissue and that's called a capsule normally it's supposed to be soft and pliable like a balloon but if the body forms an abnormal capsule it becomes hard and it contracts or squeezes down on the implant and causes pain and distortion and this typically displaces the implant up higher