The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the the population with your help is becoming younger and younger and so we are more and more aggressive because there are 70 80 90 year olds who are working out who are playing sports and we want to keep them going as long as possible because I'm getting close to that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the the population with your help is becoming younger and younger and so we are more and more aggressive because there are 70 80 90 year olds who are working out who are playing sports and we want to keep them going as long as possible