The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if there were a very limited number of embryos and that were not possible to do would that be you know a circumstance in which like you said for the purposes of direct therapy for a very bad disease in which that couple had no other alternative in terms of having a biological child would that be possible knowing that that would potenti well would affect the germ line
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.