We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
So with a sample size of 13 and a false positivity rate of 25%, you can't make any conclusions from that small study showing, you know, that 11 out of 13 people had, you know, S1 subunit of spike protein showing up in the plasma. It just doesn't make any sense to make any strong conclusions from that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.