The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a natural biophysical limitation on size and that's because the volume to surface area of any creature uh reaches a place in uh where the volume to surface area becomes no longer sustainable because the the the surface area of a Preacher um does is no longer able to deliver the oxygen and the nutrients required for aerobic living yeah
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a natural biophysical limitation on size and that's because the volume to surface area of any creature reaches a place in where the volume to surface area becomes no longer sustainable because the the the surface area of a Preacher does is no longer able to deliver the oxygen and the nutrients required for aerobic living