The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because you can have somebody take mdma in a recreational setting that's not scripted for therapy versus a therapeutic setting where the orientation is healing and it's led by a trained facilitator and you can have people have completely different experiences
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and oftentimes we've seen that like if people have had an experience with mdma and then go into a therapeutic setting they're like wow this feels totally different than anything i've done before right