The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when a person quote unquote tears their rotator cuff that can be a very heterogeneous diagnosis I mean technically that diagnosis would apply to a tear in any of those four muscles which could be in the muscle could be at the junction between the muscle and the tendon and could it also be just a complete separation of the tendon from the osseous structure of the bone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so um so when a person quote unquote tears their rotator cuff that can be a very heterogeneous diagnosis I mean technically that diagnosis would apply to a tear in any of those four muscles which could be in the muscle could be at the junction between the muscle and the tendon and could it also be just a complete separation of the tendon from the oio structure of the bone yes