The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's obviously very unfortunate because the real estate problem as a name implies it's in the periphery and what's just outside of the prostate is the high high price real estate of the nerves for erection the nerves for for urinary continents and the muscles for urinary continents so that has a big impact on how we manage prostate cancer and it's been a result that's what results in a lot of the potential side effects that occur
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.