The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In other words, it'd be really interesting if you did a six-month parallel fasting trial where if you took people and you rendered them hypoc caloric, you know, you put them on some draconian 60% calorie diet for 6 months where you really think you would tamp down inflammation and autophagy and you pro if anything's going to reprogram the epiggenome in six months, you think that would be it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.