We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
how is that possible makes no sense at all in what way could that type of farming possibly increase the carbon in the soil possibly increase the mycorrhizal fungal networks or the you know increase the top soil doesn't make any sense
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i don't know how you have regenerative farming without animals that that seems like a non-sequitur that doesn't make any sense right