Paul Saladino· MD
there are many epidemiology studies that don't show any correlation between eating meat and poor outcomes and when they do it's probably because they're sampling a population in which you're seeing more of this unhealthy user bias
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
there are many epidemiology studies that don't show any correlation between eating meat and poor outcomes and when they do it's probably because they're sampling a population in which you're seeing more of this unhealthy user bias
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and there are lots of studies that don't show any benefit to vegan or vegetarian diets for mortality and sometimes they do perhaps because they are sampling a population which with more of this healthy user buys present in the population
there are many epidemiology studies that don't show any correlation between eating meat and poor outcomes and when they do it's probably because they're sampling a population in which you're seeing more of this unhealthy user bias
there are many epidemiology studies that don't show any correlation between eating meat and poor outcomes