The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this only works when the architecture of the liver is preserved so once you cross into the path of therosis and inflammation uh it's over that so unfortunately that person whose liver has been so beat up for example uh status post na Nash or alcohol liver disease you get to a point where it no longer has that capacity to regenerate
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.