The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I said you have about a 50 chance of getting better and that's just a scope clean out we know they have arthritis they don't have instability and just try to clean them out and buy them some more time kick this can as far down the road as possible
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I said what I would probably do even though the data is not great it's one of the few things I do that I know but I tell him at the outset that you have about a 50 chance of getting better and that's just a scope clean out we know they have arthritis they don't have instability and just try to clean them out and buy them some more time kick this can as far down the road as possible
I said what I would probably do even though the data is not great it's one of the few things I do that I know but I tell them at the outset that you have about a 50% chance of getting better and that's just a scope cleanout we know they have arthritis they don't have instability and just try to clean him out and buy him some more time kick this can as far down the road as possible