We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
can you talk about the two studies by the cdc that suggest that natural immunity is not lasting yeah these studies would not qualify for a seventh grade science fair the methodology was so poor is that fact or opinion marty that is my opinion just but i think any any honest scientist will tell you that the conclusions cannot be derived from the data
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.